JHCB

John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF

$21.61

+0.00%

Market closed. Last update: 11:57 AM ET

📎 Investment Objective

The John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) seeks to provide a high level of current income by investing primarily in a diversified portfolio of investment-grade corporate bonds.

Overview

ETF tracking John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF

Category Fixed Income

Issuer Other

Inception Date 2021-03-31

Market Cap $74.5M

Average Volume N/A

Dividend Yield 3.89%

52-Week Range $20.55 - $22.04

VWAP $21.62

Performance

Loading performance data...

Price Chart

Investment Summary

📎 Investment Objective

The John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) seeks to provide a high level of current income by investing primarily in a diversified portfolio of investment-grade corporate bonds.

🎯 Investment Strategy

The fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in investment-grade corporate bonds. The portfolio is actively managed, with the goal of generating attractive risk-adjusted returns through security selection and duration management.

✨ Key Features

Focuses on investment-grade corporate bonds for stable income generation
Actively managed approach to identify attractive opportunities and manage interest rate risk
Low expense ratio of 0.00% makes it a cost-effective fixed income option
Relatively new fund with limited performance history

⚠️ Primary Risks

Interest rate risk: The fund's value may decline when interest rates rise
Credit risk: The risk of default or downgrade by the issuers of the bonds held in the portfolio
Liquidity risk: Potential difficulty in selling holdings, especially in stressed market conditions
Concentration risk: The fund's focus on corporate bonds makes it susceptible to factors affecting that sector

👤 Best For

The John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF may be suitable for investors seeking a low-cost, investment-grade corporate bond exposure as part of a diversified fixed income allocation. It may be particularly appealing to those looking for a stable source of income, although the lack of performance history should be considered.